| 7 November |
Insect And Pest Removal Can Really Cost You. |
As projected by an industrial insecticide official, the government’s most recent laws may make American consumers expend an additional $145 million dollars per year to regulate the presence of the powder post beetle, a very prevalent pest. The Environmental Protection Agency denies these allegations claiming that even though they have outlawed a particularly popular chemical, there are still several other options that are just as effective and cost the same amount as well.
When the EPA decided to remove one particular pesticide brand from the market it made it much costlier to treat powder post beetle infestation, according to the vice president of a pest control company. He noted that the powder post beetle, the target of the treatment in question, is similar to the termite and affects as many 140,000 homes a year.The pesticide in question was often used by pest control companies to control the beetles by spraying the chemical in areas where it was needed; the chemical was so effective, the companies could then guarantee that the house would remain beetle-free for at least one year. Pest control insiders say that now that they cannot use this product they have to use chemicals that have to be sprayed in the entire house. Pest Controllers information is only a click away.
Because of the process of fumigation and the need to fill the house with chemical gas, the resident now has to vacate their home. The cost for fumigation is much higher, costing the homeowner anywhere from $1,000 to $2,000, far more that the cost for the standard chemical spray. In disputing the cost claims of the official, an EPA spokesman would say another pesticide of a comparable effect and expense was discovered by the chemical industry to replace the one which was banned. He has also stated that the powder post beetle presents only visual issues without bringing about any structural harm, unlike termites.
The new chemical is pentachlorophenol, which has already been approved by the EPA for controlling the powder post beetle, and provides effective control for nearly the same price as the banned pesticide. Hopefully, this means that there will not be significant adjustments in the cost of keeping a home pest free.Even the company who prduced the banned chemical and some members of the pest control association are in agreement with the findings of the EPA. Whether or not to establish a temporary hold of the chemical use by permanently banning it was apparently the testimony which was given at the EPA hearings.
If the industry insiders fears are realized, it would mean that consumers will be asked to pay millions of extra dollars a year to fend off the powder post beetle. Some companies have been using the same methods for pest removal for over 30 years, and they now fear that many of their older customers are going to be unwilling to accept the increased cost, the change, and the fact that in order for the new method to be used they have to leave their home. The EPA based its decision on information which was incomplete, he also claims. He says there is no doubt that the decision made was the wrong one, and he hopes that the EPA will reverse their decision, but he is not hopeful that such a move could happen quickly.